Every issue, every party, in one place — published one verified topic at a time, starting with Israel and Palestine. Each issue is marked State, Federal, Local or Both, so you can see which parliament actually decides it. Positions are summarised from the public record, and each table says when it was checked. More categories are added as each is verified.
Nine categories are published so far — immigration, Israel and Palestine, AUKUS, energy, tax, housing, homelessness, royal commissions and transparency, and health and Medicare. Each row is a decision a parliament actually takes, and the tag under the issue name says which parliament takes it — a state member cannot legislate a migration cap, and a federal member cannot rewrite a restraining order Act. Sovereign Australia’s column is drawn from the party’s own published platform and policy pages; every other column is drawn from that party’s own material.
Checked 27 August 2026 · Full comparison: ten questions across four parties →
Caps, students, housing, values tests, deportation, citizenship waits and the humanitarian intake — compared from the 2026–27 Budget papers, Home Affairs planning levels, the ABS migration release and each party’s own statements. Sovereign Australia’s column is open: the position is in development, and the commitment already made is to publish arrivals, departures, visa holders and Australians abroad as live data for everyone on the People’s Portal.
| Issue | Sovereign Australia | Labor | Coalition | Greens | One Nation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall migration level Federal |
Position in development | Target 225,000 by 2028; detailed overhaul delayed | No policy until the 2028 election; earlier language “well under 200,000” | The only party not proposing a cut | Hard cap of 130,000, confirmed as net overseas migration |
| International students Federal |
Position in development | Planning level of 295,000 places for 2026 | System called a “total scam” to be scaled back; no figure | Rejects the claim students drive the housing crisis | Would close the study-to-residency “loophole” |
| Deportation and enforcement Federal |
Position in development | $167.4m over four years for system integrity | Crackdown vowed on overstayers and “unfounded asylum claims” | Opposes expanded removal powers; end offshore detention | Would deport 75,000 people it says are illegal migrants |
| Refugees and humanitarian Federal |
Position in development | 20,000 was forecast to lapse to 13,750; PM confirmed 20,000 stays, 27 August | No increase proposed | Expand to 50,000; end offshore detention | Would withdraw from the UN Refugee Convention |
| What is measured Federal |
Live migration data for everyone — arrivals, departures, visa holders by class — on the People’s Portal | Quarterly ABS figure, reconciled after the fact | No measurement reform proposed | No measurement reform proposed | No measurement reform proposed |
Checked August 2026 · Full comparison: eight federal issues, the law, and the state governments →
| Issue | Sovereign Australia | Labor | Coalition | Greens | One Nation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recognition and border Federal |
Recognised; border on the 1967 Green Line | Recognised at the UN, September 2025, with conditions | Opposes; calls for reversal; only after a negotiated process | Supports recognition; abandoned the two-state framing in 2023 | Opposes; none until Israel’s security is guaranteed |
| Gaza Federal |
Accepts the UN Commission finding of genocide; Israel to answer at the ICJ | Condemns conduct; does not itself attribute genocide | Rejects the characterisation; supports removal of Hamas | Calls it genocide; demands sanctions | Denies genocide; supports the campaign |
| Settlements and annexation Federal |
Unlawful; no recognition beyond the Green Line; Israel to prosecute settler crimes; targeted sanctions until it does; settlement-goods labelling | Settlements illegal; sanctions on some settlers | Two states by negotiation; opposes unilateral measures | Sanctions; end settlement trade | No detailed policy |
| Arms and components Federal |
Suspend everything — weapons, parts, sub-components, explosives, dual-use; publish the register; end-use test in law | States it exports no weapons; remains in the F-35 chain | Maintain defence ties | Full two-way arms embargo | No stated position |
| Foreign influence at home State + Federal |
Royal Commission into foreign influence, including Israel-aligned lobbying; close the FITS charity and domestic-funding gaps; full transparency of sponsored travel and donations | Administers the FITS; 2025 donation caps and $5,000 disclosure threshold; no measure on Israel-aligned lobbying | Joined Labor to pass the 2025 donation caps; no measure on Israel-aligned lobbying | Opposed the 2025 caps deal as favouring the major parties; wants corporate donations banned | No stated position |
Checked 27 August 2026 · Full comparison: the pact, the boats, the cost, the bases and the alternative →
The pact, the submarines, the $368 billion, US forces at HMAS Stirling and the question of sovereignty — compared from the agreement documents, Defence announcements and each party’s own statements. Sovereign Australia’s position: AUKUS repositioned, not cancelled — the same yards and workforce redirected to sovereign capability, and AUASIA in its place.
| Issue | Sovereign Australia | Labor | Coalition | Greens | One Nation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The pact Federal |
Repositioned, not cancelled — yards and workforce redirected | Fully committed, both pillars | Committed; criticises pace only | Withdraw; renegotiate ANZUS | Supports in principle; one senator broke ranks |
| The submarines Federal |
No nuclear boats — unmanned coastal platforms and the corridor fleet this decade | Three second-hand Virginias, then SSN-AUKUS from the 2040s | Backs the eight-boat pathway | Cancel — second-hand deal “doesn’t stack up” | Backs the boats; wants missiles now |
| US forces on our soil Federal |
Australian command of every base on Australian soil | “Enduring access” at Stirling; 2,300 Americans by 2030 | Supports the presence | Opposes the expanding footprint | Alliance vital; Australia should pull its weight |
| What instead Federal |
AUASIA — armed, neutral, friend to all; the industrial base and grid union | AUKUS is the plan | No alternative stated | “Regional defence” and diplomacy | Missiles and platforms inside the alliance |
Checked 27 August 2026 · Full comparison: targets, prices, coal, nuclear and fuel security →
The targets, the price of a kilowatt hour, coal, nuclear and the fuel in the tank — compared from platforms, releases and parliamentary votes. Sovereign Australia’s position: price first — a legislated 10 cents a kilowatt hour for households and small business, coal decided by the market, no nuclear, and fuel Australia makes.
| Issue | Sovereign Australia | Labor | Coalition | Greens | One Nation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The targets Federal |
Repeal the legislated target; measure the price of power and import dependence instead | 43 per cent by 2030, net zero by 2050 — legislated | Scrap the targets; net zero a “welcome outcome” only | Faster cuts than legislated | Opposes net zero |
| Power prices State + Federal |
10c/kWh legislated for households and small business by end of first term | Bill relief; default offers cut from July 2026; grid investment | Baseload, new gas, lift the nuclear ban | Electrification with grants and loans | Cut bills 20 per cent via market rule changes |
| Nuclear Federal |
Opposed — “we don’t need it” | Opposed; the ban stands | Lift the ban; reactors at former coal sites | Opposed | Lift the ban; backs modern nuclear |
| Fuel security Federal |
Drill, refine here, hold a true 90-day Australian-made reserve | Reserve, stockholding obligation, refinery payments; WA refinery investigation announced July 2026 | Supports domestic refining; no separate policy | Opposes new oil and gas exploration | 90-day onshore reserves; halve fuel excise |
Checked 27 August 2026 · Full comparison: income tax, capital gains, GST, royalties and relief →
Income tax, the capital gains and negative gearing fight, corporate tax, the GST, resource royalties and cost-of-living relief — compared from platforms, budget papers and parliamentary votes. Sovereign Australia’s position: a $50,000 tax-free threshold, one resource levy in place of eight regimes, and relief that operates on the cost rather than the price.
| Issue | Sovereign Australia | Labor | Coalition | Greens | One Nation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Income tax Federal |
$50,000 tax-free threshold; 30 per cent flat falling to 20 | Legislated cuts from 2026–27; $1,000 instant deduction | Opposed the cuts; vowed repeal | Tax large corporations and high wealth harder | Raise the threshold; income splitting for families |
| Capital gains and negative gearing Federal |
30 per cent on property gains, no discount; end negative gearing on investment properties | Reforms passed June 2026; amendment bills in August after backlash | Repeal — “axe Labor’s toxic taxes” | Curb the concessions; opposed the widow’s-tax element | Joined the push against the widow’s tax |
| Resource royalties State + Federal |
One Resource Extraction Levy replacing eight regimes, the PRRT and company tax on extraction | 2023 PRRT changes; state regimes untouched | Opposes new resource taxes | Higher tax on fossil fuel and mining profits | Volume royalty on all oil and gas — $10–13bn a year |
| Cost-of-living relief State + Federal |
Operate on the cost, not the price: competition reform and 10c/kWh power | Rebates, cheaper medicines, fee-free TAFE, the fuel excise cut | Backed the excise cut; blames energy costs on Labor | Electrification, dental into Medicare, rent caps | Halve fuel excise; cut power bills 20 per cent |
Checked 27 August 2026 · Full comparison: supply, tax settings, first home buyers and renters →
Supply, the tax settings, first home buyers and renters — compared from platforms, budget papers and parliamentary votes. Sovereign Australia’s position: three new rungs below the house — Community Towns, commercial conversion and corridor towns — and a tax system rebuilt around productive investment.
| Issue | Sovereign Australia | Labor | Coalition | Greens | One Nation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Supply State + Federal |
Three new rungs below the house: Community Towns, commercial conversion, corridor towns | 1.2m Accord target — expert panel says not met until end of 2030, 204,000 short | Free up land supply and approvals | Government as developer | GST off building materials; cut government charges |
| Tax settings Federal |
30 per cent on property gains, no discount; end negative gearing on investment properties | The June 2026 package: negative gearing to new builds from July 2027 | Repeal the package | Supportive; wants the concessions phased out | Keep negative gearing on up to two properties |
| First home buyers Federal |
No deposit-side subsidy — demand-side help raises the price | Help to Buy; 5 per cent deposit scheme, 247,000 buyers by April 2026 | Super for a deposit | Opposes demand-side subsidies | Ban non-citizen ownership; cut migration |
| Renters and approvals State |
Approvals on a statutory clock; granny flats as of right; land release tied to transport | Renters’ rights via National Cabinet | Opposes rent caps | Rent caps and a freeze | Tax-free room rental; free up granny flats |
Checked 27 August 2026 · Full comparison: the approach, the rental exit, crisis housing and the measure →
The approach, the exit into a rental, crisis housing and what is measured — compared from platforms, releases and funding agreements. Sovereign Australia’s position: Housing First in every major city and regional centre, a Commonwealth bond guarantee for people exiting homelessness, and healing towns for the most complex cases.
| Issue | Sovereign Australia | Labor | Coalition | Greens | One Nation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The approach State + Federal |
Housing First in every major city and regional centre; supply built underneath | $9.3bn state agreement, $400m/yr dedicated; 55,000 homes | No dedicated policy; land supply and approvals | 50,000 Housing First tenancies; $550m/yr for services | Cut migration demand; GST off materials |
| Exiting into a rental Federal |
Commonwealth bond guarantee — six months of rent to the landlord | Rent Assistance increases; National Cabinet renters’ rights | No policy published | Social rent capped at 25 per cent of income | Tax-free room rental; free up granny flats |
| Crisis housing Federal |
Healing towns for the most complex cases, not cycling through city emergency beds | $1.2bn+ crisis and transitional; 448 homes for 22,000 women and children, August 2026 | No separate policy published | Crisis accommodation with family-violence priority | No separate policy published |
| What is measured Federal |
The homelessness rate as a standing People’s Portal metric | Census and AIHW reporting; no standing metric | No commitment published | No commitment published | No commitment published |
Checked 27 August 2026 · Full comparison: the commissions, COVID-19, media and lobbying, and the machinery →
The commissions on the table, the COVID-19 question, media and lobbying, and the standing transparency machinery — compared from the parliamentary record. Sovereign Australia’s position: seven Royal Commissions in the first term — the Sunlight Agenda — with full coercive powers, no carve-outs, and the first within 90 days.
| Issue | Sovereign Australia | Labor | Coalition | Greens | One Nation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Commissions on the table Federal |
Seven in the first term; the first within 90 days | None new committed; points to its delivered commissions | Senators recommended a COVID-19 royal commission | Endorsed a COVID-19 commission and a media inquiry with RC powers | Sustained COVID-19 campaign; Senate motion passed |
| COVID-19 Federal |
Commission number one — no state carve-outs | Departmental inquiry, October 2024; said it sufficed | “Overwhelming case” for a commission, per its committee members | “Australians deserve a royal commission” | Motions, inquiries, a 41,079-signature petition |
| Media and lobbying Federal |
Commissions into media monopoly and lobbying & foreign influence | No commission proposed | No commission proposed | Judicial inquiry into media concentration with RC powers | None beyond COVID-19 |
| Standing machinery Federal |
No Secrets doctrine; the People’s Portal as standing public data | Established the NACC, from July 2023 | Supported the NACC legislation | Backed the NACC; wants a lower bar on public hearings | Supports scrutiny; no machinery of its own proposed |
Checked 27 August 2026 · Full comparison: bulk billing, mental health, dental, prevention and the measure →
Bulk billing and the GP, mental health, dental and the PBS, prevention, and what is measured — compared from platforms, budget papers and Medicare data. Sovereign Australia’s position: bulk billing restored through independently set rebates, obesity fixed at source through education, ten free mental-health sessions, and dental into Medicare.
| Issue | Sovereign Australia | Labor | Coalition | Greens | One Nation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bulk billing Federal |
Rebates to 95 per cent of the AMA fee regional, 85 metro — $0 GP from day one | $8.5bn expansion to all patients; nine in ten by 2030 | Matched dollar-for-dollar — $9bn | Free GP visits | Lift Medicare rebates |
| Mental health Federal |
Ten sessions at zero gap; 200 public psychiatry positions | Halved the sessions to ten from 2023; Medicare Mental Health Centres | $500m to restore the halved sessions | Free mental healthcare in Medicare | No detailed policy published |
| Dental and the PBS Federal |
Dental into Medicare; the PBS shielded from trade agreements | Cheaper scripts from January 2026; no dental | Matched cheaper medicines; no dental | Dental into Medicare | No position published |
| Prevention Federal |
Obesity fixed at source: education from Year 1, junk-food ad ban, additives review | No prevention-first program published | No prevention-first program published | Supports junk-food ad restrictions | No program published |
| What is measured Federal |
Portal metrics: bulk-billing rate, ED waits, mental health beds, male suicide rate | Departmental reporting; no standing metric | No commitment published | No commitment published | No commitment published |
Positions summarised from party platforms, releases, statements and parliamentary votes as at August 2026. “No stated position” and “no detailed policy” mean none found on the public record, not indifference. One Nation’s positions are drawn from speeches and Senate interventions rather than a published platform. Labor’s and the Coalition’s are government and opposition positions respectively and may move. On rows marked State, a party column refers to that party’s state branch or state government, not the federal party. This table states each party’s position, not this party’s characterisation of it. The full comparison — all eight federal issues, the six laws that govern foreign influence and the gap in each, and the state governments side by side — is at Israel and Palestine: the full comparison. The party position in full is Memo 11.
Categories are published as each one is verified row by row. Still to be checked and added: mental health, family, education, children online and social media, media and free speech, defence and AUKUS, gambling, First Australians, farming and water, small business, tobacco and vapes, cannabis, AI, environment.
Sovereign Australia’s position on each of those is already published on its own policy page and in the platform — the work is verifying what every other party has said, one row at a time. Where a party has said nothing on the public record, this page says so. A cell is never filled from memory.